<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a God?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/</link>
	<description>Insights on Philosophy, Psychology, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.werkkrew.com/?p=116#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve attended meeting for a few months, after having the intention to for quite some time.(It&#039;s a long story. ask me to fill you in some time.)

My problem with finding answers in science is that there&#039;s still no deeper *purpose* in that. I believe science explains most things, if not all things, but I need meaning, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve attended meeting for a few months, after having the intention to for quite some time.(It&#8217;s a long story. ask me to fill you in some time.)</p>
<p>My problem with finding answers in science is that there&#8217;s still no deeper *purpose* in that. I believe science explains most things, if not all things, but I need meaning, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MooGoo</title>
		<link>http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>MooGoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.werkkrew.com/?p=116#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of the old pagan gods. They were anything but all powerful/all knowing/all wise. They were more like arrogant super villains. Constantly feuding with each other and totally indifferent to the plight of lowly mortals. 

And then there&#039;s the whole prospect of being elevated to Godhood. Can&#039;t do that these days, best you can get is like sainthood and usually only after you die.

So I like to think that God is like the most eeeeevil, most powerful super villain, and that he spends his time maniacally laughing in his throne room (with say Emperor Palpatine&#039;s theme music being played in the background) while watching us puny humons scurry about the earth like displaced ants as he reigns death and destruction on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the old pagan gods. They were anything but all powerful/all knowing/all wise. They were more like arrogant super villains. Constantly feuding with each other and totally indifferent to the plight of lowly mortals. </p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the whole prospect of being elevated to Godhood. Can&#8217;t do that these days, best you can get is like sainthood and usually only after you die.</p>
<p>So I like to think that God is like the most eeeeevil, most powerful super villain, and that he spends his time maniacally laughing in his throne room (with say Emperor Palpatine&#8217;s theme music being played in the background) while watching us puny humons scurry about the earth like displaced ants as he reigns death and destruction on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werkkrew</title>
		<link>http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>werkkrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.werkkrew.com/?p=116#comment-80</guid>
		<description>You go where?  What!?  When did this happen?  Quakers?

Anyhow, I agree with your first point entirely, the God is Love debate is highly flawed and sounds like something out of the flower power era.  I would also call myself a &quot;seeker&quot; but I do not seek solace in religion, but science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You go where?  What!?  When did this happen?  Quakers?</p>
<p>Anyhow, I agree with your first point entirely, the God is Love debate is highly flawed and sounds like something out of the flower power era.  I would also call myself a &#8220;seeker&#8221; but I do not seek solace in religion, but science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.werkkrew.com/2008/07/17/is-there-a-god/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.werkkrew.com/?p=116#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Two things on this one. Firstly, If you&#039;re going to go with &quot;God is love&quot; You have to then take into account &quot;Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 
It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.&quot; (I Corinthians 13:5-6) and I don&#039;t think any version of the Abrahamic god can live up to that. That&#039;s probably a more Buddhist trait, if anything. God was always kind of a vengeful dude.

That said, I&#039;ve always been a bit of a seeker, despite being perpetually surrounded by atheists, and am now a regular churchgoer... sort of. I attend Quaker meeting; and though that is tentatively a &quot;Christian&quot; faith, the premise is that God is part of everyone, if you will shut up long enough to listen. (sort of) I feel like it reconciles my belief that most religions have gotten it WRONG, without denying the fact that there is more order than nothingness; or in anyway disputing or interfering with science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things on this one. Firstly, If you&#8217;re going to go with &#8220;God is love&#8221; You have to then take into account &#8220;Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.<br />
It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.&#8221; (I Corinthians 13:5-6) and I don&#8217;t think any version of the Abrahamic god can live up to that. That&#8217;s probably a more Buddhist trait, if anything. God was always kind of a vengeful dude.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ve always been a bit of a seeker, despite being perpetually surrounded by atheists, and am now a regular churchgoer&#8230; sort of. I attend Quaker meeting; and though that is tentatively a &#8220;Christian&#8221; faith, the premise is that God is part of everyone, if you will shut up long enough to listen. (sort of) I feel like it reconciles my belief that most religions have gotten it WRONG, without denying the fact that there is more order than nothingness; or in anyway disputing or interfering with science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
